Kathleen Parker’s Article, First Three Years Aren’t That Critical Essay

Kathleen Parkers Article, First Three Years Arent That life-sustainingDid your mother read to you when you were six weeks old? Did she teach you how to do maths problems when you were two? Recently, I read an issue of Parenting Magazine and found an obligate on pincer development. Kathleen Parkers term, First Three Years Arent That Critical tells us that parents forthwith are putting to much wildness on what the media and medical journals are saying, instead of apply harsh sense. The member emphasizes that parents are going overboard on these new studies using peachy argumentative proficiencys. Although I found non all of what she said was accurate, I still felt she got her express across. Parker uses evidence from scientists and medical books, to further behave the lector to side with her opinion. Parker uses good persuasive techniques by showing that not everything you read in the media about pincer development is true or factual. Parker also shows that she is not o ne-sided on the issue and gives a individual(prenominal) comment about the opposing viewpoint. I feel the author proved her point that parents are being ridiculous in how they are peak their child these days. In the first few paragraphs, author attracts the attention of the reader and explains the main point of the article. The author begins the article saying that she Pitys todays parents who want to do the right thing. The sentence attracts the audience to continue edition the article because the sentence sparks curiosity in why the author pities todays parents. The article continues, They parents buy child-rearing books, explore over psychology articles, turn Mozart in nurseries fes as well asned with alphabet cards and the periodic gameboard. Parker shows good persuasive technique by describing an exaggerated scenario of what parents are doing these days to try to develop their childs mind. Although the scenario is not believable, the exaggeration helps to prove that paren ts are being extravagant in the port they develop their children. Parker states her position clearly when she comments that parenting should not be that challenging nor as ridiculous as parents are making it. She states that by buying books and playing Mozart to children would be going overboard. This argument could offend volume who believe that reading and teaching kids early is a better way to develop their minds or peo... ...ly years is ridiculous. Parker effectively gave evidence to her argument by quoting from scientists and medical literature. Using evidence to support Parkers overall point made the article more persuasive and convincing. Although she gave some information without evidence, such(prenominal) as in the Jefferson story, she still makes a point in the argument. I felt that Kathleen Parker was persuasive in showing that parents are believing too much what the media and what new medical findings are saying and not using common sense during the first few years o f a childs life. As a parent you should be concentrating on gentle and nourishing your child rather than trying to teach it algebra. Parents have been raise their children for thousands of years and I do not believe that these news articles should convert the way people are raising their children now. How did your mother raise you? I am sure she did not have a periodic table on hand when she was rocking you to sleep. Parents have other things to worry about rather than trying to change their parental habits because what some controversial news article said. Let parents use what their mother and father used when raising them common sense.