Sunday, April 21, 2019

An Objective Way of thinking using mathematical principles Article - 1

An Objective Way of thinking using mathematical principles - Article slipThen one and only(a) should seek to establish for each class of experience, what classes of knowledge are required for that class. For the opthalmic class of Experience one realises that all that can be acquired are those classes of knowledge that the individuals senses can receive without any interpretation. This reasoning can be set out in the random variable of a series or SET of equations3/ star of these classes is the visual experience e.g. viewing the beingness that surrounds us for which the ONLY class of knowledge one requires to satisfy this class of experience, is that which can be self-possessed through the specific humans senses e.g. for the sight sense, colours that form shapes. This applies to all the members of reality that take aim up the area that surrounds us. No further interpretation is required or can be make through the visual experience.See also the solution to Big Question 2 whic h details how the individualized TEMPLATE works. For it includes what classes of knowledge the senses can detect and those that cannot be detected I.e. complete SET that can be used to represent any human.4/ Thus by adopting this thinking strategy of accepting what one receives through the senses without personal interpretation I.e. subjectivity perceptions, everyone would be able to see the same / real world rather than seeking to create their own world.My appreciation for Roger Penroses essay asking What is reality? was diminished because he gave no clear-cut definition of what he means by reality (18 November, p 32). As a result, the discussion seemed like nothing so much as an overview of the implicit etymology and current range of English-language meanings of that word. One can easily imagine dictionary definitions that either include or exclude physical events at the quantum scale, or human mental events such as unexpressed thoughts.I am not a linguist, but I suspect that the words for reality in other languages may not on the dot

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.